Former death row inmate
ordered freed
Missourians for
Alternatives to the Death Penalty decries resources spent on capital
punishment
Kansas City, MO, August 3,
2011---Following the Missouri Supreme Court ruling ordering a prison
inmate once facing execution to be set free, Missourians for
Alternatives to the Death Penalty decries the resources spent on
capital punishment in the state.
Reginald Griffin had originally been
sentenced to death for stabling another inmate to death at the
Moberly prison in 1983. In 1993 he was re-sentenced to life without
parole for 50 years. In a 4-3 ruling handed down August 2 the high
court agreed that the prosecutor had withheld evidence that could
have proven Griffin’s innocence.
The court noted that the state failed
to disclose evidence that prison guards caught another inmate with a
weapon in the prison yard just minutes after inmate James Bausley was
fatally stabbed. That disclosure plus other developments since the
Griffin’s trial compelled the court to order his release or require
the prosecutor to re-try the case within 60 days.
“The case of Reginald Griffin shows
how broken the death penalty system is in our state,” noted Rita
Linhardt, chair of the Board for Missourians for Alternatives to the
Death Penalty (MADP). “The state spent considerable time and money
to obtain a death sentence, and now the case against Mr. Griffin has
totally crumbled. Missourians would have been better served if these
resources would have been spent elsewhere.”
MADP firmly believes that the death
penalty is a wasteful and inefficient government policy that impedes
law enforcement, delays justice for victim’s families and devours
crime-fight dollars that could otherwise be used to save lives and
protect the public.
“Studies from more than a dozen
states have found that the death penalty is up to ten times more
expensive than sentences of life or life without parole,” notes
Linhardt. “With the state of Missouri cutting over a billion
dollars from its budget this year, it makes no sense to continue with
this wasteful public policy.”
Research shows that death penalty cases
cost more because capital cases involve more lawyers, more witnesses,
more experts, a longer jury selection process, more pre-trial
motions, an entirely separate trial for sentencing and countless
other expenses—racking up exorbitant costs even before a singe
appeal is filed.
“The death penalty’s high costs add
up to more than just dollars,” said Ms. Linhardt. “In the time it
takes to pursue one capital case, law enforcement could solve and
prosecute scores of non-capital cases. Instead, many crimes go
unsolved or un-prosecuted, and those responsible are free to commit
more serious crimes.”
Law enforcement is recognizing the
failure of the death penalty. In a 2009 national poll of police
chiefs, the death penalty was considered the least efficient use of
taxpayers’ money. Police chiefs ranked expanded training for
police officers, community policing and programs to control drug and
alcohol abuse more effective than the death penalty.
The case against Mr. Griffin was built
on the testimony of two inmates, one who later recanted his testimony
and another whose testimony was suspect. No physical evidence
connected Griffin to the crime.
“It was very fortuitous that Mr.
Griffin was not executed,” noted Ms. Linhardt.
No comments:
Post a Comment